Looks nice, is pretty expensive and I don't see the necessity especially given the huge amount of efforts to replace the heatsink (others reported that earlier)
I don't know what I'm doing wrong but I repeated the test done by your tester and get rather different numbers (room temp ~23°C, stock heatsink):
38°C idle and 56°C with the light 'stress' workload. What am I'm doing wrong?! Might settings matter?
___ _ _ _ ____ ____
/ _ \ __| |_ __ ___ (_) __| | / ___|___ \
| | | |/ _` | '__/ _ \| |/ _` | | | __) |
| |_| | (_| | | | (_) | | (_| | | |___ / __/
\___/ \__,_|_| \___/|_|\__,_| \____|_____|
Welcome to ARMBIAN Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS 3.14.79-odroidc2
System load: 0.00 Up time: 6 min
IP: 192.168.83.81
CPU temp: 39°C
Usage of /: 32% of 7.0G
[ 5 updates to install: apt-get upgrade ]
Last login: Wed Oct 12 20:03:41 2016 from 192.168.83.91
tk@odroidc2:~$ stress -c $(nproc --all) -t 600
stress: info: [1525] dispatching hogs: 4 cpu, 0 io, 0 vm, 0 hdd
stress: info: [1525] successful run completed in 600s
tk@odroidc2:~$ uname -a
Linux odroidc2 3.14.79-odroidc2 #8 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 13 23:00:48 CEST 2016 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
tk@odroidc2:~$ cat /etc/armbian-release
# PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
BOARD=odroidc2
BOARD_NAME="Odroid C2"
VERSION=5.16
LINUXFAMILY=odroidc2
BRANCH=default
ARCH=arm64
BTW: Even running cpuburn-a53 doesn't lead to throttling on ODROID-C2 with default heatsink (temperature after 10 minutes just 75°C and SoC still happily clocking at the highest clockspeed).
No thanks, I'm pretty satisfied with the stock heatsink (Hardkernel did a good job here). But here at Armbian we always do the necessary fine-tuning for the boards we support and that might make a difference?